Ganhi, King, and Mandela: What Made Non-Violence Work?

Ferdinand Magellan was a Portuguese explorer who started his voyage in Spain and was the first explorer to circumnavigate, meaning to blend in all the around the world. He was executeed on April 27, 1521 by the natives on the island of Cebu in the Philippines era legion(predicate) of his own custody stayed on the boat despite k at presenting their passkey was in trouble. The inquire being asked was whether or non this captain was worthy defending. This question could be answered either way just in this essay we are breathing out to argue that Magellan was non worth defending.Ferdinand Magellan was not worth defending because he was un organize, he forced and threatened natives in the Philippines to switch to his religion of Catholicism and knowly, he was distinguished and could awe less about the crewmembers needs. Magellan wasnt organized as a loss leader because during their voyage after they had crossed the Atlantic Ocean and had sailed eat the coast of what we no w call the countries of Brazil and Argentina, he discover that the supplies might not last them the reside of their trip. Because of this Magellan put each crewmember on a limited about of nutrient that they could confuse each day.Many of the men grew ill, were real worried with this decision and wanted to return folk, scarce Magellan refused to listen to any of their needs. This shows that Magellan was not a in truth organized leader because he didnt bring enough food and supplies that could last for each and e very crewmember during their many long years on sea. A mutiny was in like manner organized against Magellan, and in self-defense he killed everyone who was against him including leaders and captains on the other ships. This shows he was not organized because if he was, his own men would not project gone against him and well-tried to kill him.The decision that Magellan made that changed his life was also a very important primer that could support the aim that he was not worth defending. Magellan was killed in the Philippines after he forced all the natives to convert to Catholicism. Those who didnt were threatened just like the colonization on Mactan that he burned down after they did not convert. If Magellan did not function that fearful decision he could flummox been with his remaining men as they unblemished the voyage. This decision he made shows he was probably not a very good leader, it also supports the reason he was norganized. Magellan should have made a transgress decision, which was to leave the natives alone in their home and try to accomplish his goal, which was to reach the raciness Islands. The fact that when the natives went up against Magellan and his men stayed in the ship knowing he was in danger shows his men disliked him and that he may of done other horrible things to them that we are not aware of. The last explanation that bathroom support the argument on whether or not Magellan was worth defending was that h e was very bossy, and slipshod of his mens need.The men on board played a very important role and greatly helped him bewilder the first leader to circumnavigate. Without the men, this might have not been possible. In the documents there is no prove that shows he was ever glad for them. We are also not precondition much information on the men who liked him and thought of him as a great leader. The documents just explain to us how he was bossy and didnt care about them. In Document D we are told how many of the men got very sick and their gums swelled up causation them to be unable to eat.In these documents we are not told Magellan was ever starving or sick, that gives evidence that makes us predict he was self-seeking and kept the good food for himself and tried to keep only himself as good as possible. In conclusion, Ferdinand Magellan was once again, not worth defending. He was unorganized, made horrible decisions and was a very inconsiderate and inconsiderate leader. The reasons explained above give evidence that can answer the question of whether or not Magellan worth defending.